When examining Microsoft Dynamics, one will notice that it generally does not suffer with these same forms of limitations. It will, however, have its own pair of drawbacks that may be choking your growth.
For those that’ll not know, Microsoft (MS) Dynamics resembles Microsoft Office because MS Dynamics is just a suite of business application products. In Microsoft Office, there is Word, Excel, Outlook, Powerpoint, Outlook. Each one of these programs have a distinct purpose and they interact pretty much together – but it’s nearly the same picture with MS Dynamics as you will soon see.
Essentially, Microsoft Dynamics is a marketing name for a bunch of business applications offering one CRM and and four (that we shall focus on) ERP systems. Only 1, the CRM, was created from the bottom up by Microsoft and is web based.
You will find primarily four main Microsoft ERP packages which are offered in the United States: GP (previously Great Plains Software), NAV (previously Navision), AX (previously Axapta), and SL (previously Solomon). Dynamics GP Cloud These four business packages were purchased by Microsoft to make sure they own a foothold in the business software space. Each of these systems certainly are a Windows package (problematic within an increasingly Apple oriented world). Each system is targeted to serve different clients but there is a quite heavy overlap in features and capacities.
Each one of these ERP packages have an extended and solid history. But there are some limitations in comparison with Cloud apps such as for instance NetSuite. First and foremost, you have to purchase equipment, server software, and labor to setup, maintain and manage the system. All of this requires business expenditure – and that is where you could see your growth inhibited. All the money spent managing these processes, could be definitely better used to develop your business.
Another weakness with one of these independent packages is that each of them have their particular reporting capacities. Integrated reporting produces easier business planning. In Microsoft Dynamics, you should write your own reports to mix the information stored within the independent ERP and CRM systems. And Microsoft offers just one more product to get to your data, the Management Reporter. Overall, you won’t get the best business intelligence because the info is stored in multiple locations. That is one of many strengths of fully integrated business management software, such as for instance NetSuite.
Microsoft is promoting its own Cloud offering. It is known as Azure, which is really a solution to host these business apps to perform in the Cloud. This will eliminate the requirement for hardware and server software. But there are still challenges, including the need to determine and put up an Azure environment and make certain it functions properly. That means you still better have an IT geek nearby to greatly help out. Naturally, there are third parties which are readily available for hosting and set up. But most of these processes have costs associated together that may be avoided with the best architecture and offer; in essence, this method means you’re outsourcing a section of one’s IT; although not nearly enough of it. For most businesses, there is little competitive value in managing all that software in the cloud.
Your costs will be higher since the architecture of Dynamics isn’t multi-tenent. It had been meant to be its own unique instance. A large drawback is that you should manually perform your own upgrades – and if you never, you’ll get behind and possibly risk the requirement to execute a new implementation; like investing in new software. The advantage of software systems, such as for instance NetSuite, is that the program is upgraded twice a year, is included in the contract, and you can’t get behind.